Joseph Herrin (09-24-2012)
months back I posted a blog on the subject of the Liberty Bell. The
story of the Liberty Bell features prominently in the founding of
America as a nation, and is a staple of public school history lessons.
Following is an excerpt from that article.
Bell has become a symbol of America as a constitutional nation. The
Liberty Bell was hung in Independence Hall where the American
Constitution was voted on and adopted. For many years The Liberty Bell
was displayed inside Constitution Hall. The Liberty Bell is readily
identified by a prominent crack that is quite extensive.
Liberty Bell Crack
understand the parable contained in this symbol of America one needs to
know a little of the history of this bell. Keep in mind that
Philadelphia was the Capital of the nascent nation prior to Washington
D.C. being constructed.
In 1751, with a bell tower
being built in the Pennsylvania State House, civic authorities sought a
bell of better quality, which could be heard at a further distance in
the rapidly expanding city. Isaac Norris, speaker of the Pennsylvania
Provincial Assembly, gave orders to the colony's London agent, Robert
Charles, to obtain a "good Bell of about two thousands pound weight."
hope and rely on thy care and assistance in this affair and that thou
wilt procure and forward it by the first good oppo as our workmen inform
us it will be much less trouble to hang the Bell before their Scaffolds
are struck from the Building where we intend to place it which will not
be done 'till the end of next Summer or beginning of the Fall. Let the
bell be cast by the best workmen & examined carefully before it
is Shipped with the following words well shaped around it vizt. By Order
of the Assembly of the Province [sic] of Pensylvania [sic] for the
State house in the City of Philada 1752 and Underneath Proclaim Liberty
thro' all the Land to all the Inhabitants thereof.-Levit. XXV. 10...
It arrived in Philadelphia in August 1752. Norris wrote to Charles
that the bell was in good order, but they had not yet sounded it, as
they were building a clock for the State House's tower. The bell was mounted on a stand to test the sound, and at the first strike of the clapper, the bell's rim cracked...
Philadelphia authorities tried to return it by ship, but the master
of the vessel which had brought it was unable to take it on board.
Two local founders, John Pass and John Stow, offered to recast the
bell. Though they were inexperienced in bell casting, Pass had headed
the Mount Holly Iron Foundry in neighboring New Jersey and came from
Malta, which had a tradition of bell casting. Stow, on the other hand,
was only four years out of his apprenticeship as a brass founder. At
Stow's foundry on Second Street, the bell was broken into small pieces,
melted down, and cast into a new bell. The two founders decided that the
metal was too brittle, and augmented the bell metal by about ten
percent, using copper. The bell was ready in March 1753, and Norris
reported that the lettering (which included the founders' names and the
year) was even clearer on the new bell than on the old.
City officials scheduled a public celebration with free food and
drink for the testing of the recast bell. When the bell was struck, it
did not break, but the sound produced was described by one hearer as
like two coal scuttles being banged together. Mocked by the crowd, Pass
and Stow hastily took the bell away and again recast it. When the
fruit of the two founders' renewed efforts was brought forth in June
1753, the sound was deemed satisfactory, though Norris indicated that he
did not personally like it. The bell was hung in the steeple of the
State House the same month...
It is uncertain how the bell came to be cracked; the damage occurred
sometime between 1817 and 1846. The bell is mentioned in a number of
newspaper articles during that time; no mention of a crack can be found
until 1846. In fact, in 1837, the bell was depicted in an anti-slavery
publication—uncracked. In February 1846 Public Ledger reported that the
bell had been rung on February 23, 1846 in celebration of Washington's
Birthday (as February 22 fell on a Sunday, the celebration occurred the
next day), and also reported that the bell had long been cracked, but
had been "put in order" by having the sides of the crack filed. The
paper reported that around noon, it was discovered that the ringing had
caused the crack to be greatly extended, and that "the old Independence
Bell...now hangs in the great city steeple irreparably cracked and
remarkable history of this bell, serving as it does as a great symbol
of American liberty, and replete with highly unusual events, causes me
to suspect a divine hand in sending forth a message as God is wont to
do. The founders of America set forth to create a government where
“life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” were guaranteed (albeit,
not to all). The framer’s of the Constitution understood that man was
easily corrupted, and they sought to form a government that would resist
this tendency toward corruption...
Like The Liberty
Bell, the American form of government was flawed from the start. It was
assumed that wise men, by discerning “the laws of nature and of nature’s
God,” could codify these laws into such a form that an utopian society
could be created. Men could then live life, enjoy liberty, and pursue
happiness without the interference of tyrannical leaders or the
imposition of unjust laws. What the founding father’s did not perceive
was the depths to which mankind is corrupt. These were not Christian men
who professed themselves as disciples of the Son of God. These men were
Deists, Unitarians, and many were Freemasons. Their beliefs were
largely drawn from the teachings of those men they considered sages from
I believe it was Yahweh that
cracked The Liberty Bell from the very first time it was struck. He was
testifying that the sound produced by men being given liberty to follow
the passions of their souls would produce only a discordant sound in His
ears. Even after the bell was repaired, it sounded with such a jarring
and unpleasant sound that it was compared to two coal scuttles being
(A bucket for carrying coal.)
Solzhenitsyn, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for Literature in 1970,
commented on what he observed in the nation of America.
and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society
appears to have little defense against the abyss of human decadence,
such as, for example, misuse of liberty for moral violence against young
The Liberty Bell is a symbol of
America. The sound of her abominations has arisen to the heavens. She is
under judgment. Seeing that there is no repentance, no repudiation of
the immorality she has chosen, nor sorrow over her transgressions, the
judgments of God will fall with even greater severity.
Sodom had a bell, would not America’s Liberty Bell be a fitting symbol
for that wicked city? Did not the leading men of Philadelphia those
years ago invite God’s judgment when they inscribed their bell with
words from His holy scriptures as if Yahweh were Himself putting His
blessing upon the works of their hands?...
The Liberty Bell? Yahweh did. He was sending forth a message that men
granted free reign to choose the course their souls dictated would end
up in absolute spiritual poverty and in the depths of moral depravity.
Such is the social fabric of America today. It is a filthy garment,
detestable to the heavens.
As America’s leaders stand
and deliver speeches about celebrating homosexuality, does not the sound
of man’s liberty reach the heavens with great dissonance? America has
let man’s freedom ring. The sound has been discordant. Soon the liberty
and freedom of America will be a thing of distant memory.
present series is offered with the intent to open the eyes of the
saints of God to the great extent to which they have been propagandized.
Certain words have been imbued by Satan with false meaning. They are
held forth as emblems of righteousness, and heralded as marks of great
virtue. Two of the most corrupted words in the English language today,
especially in their association with the people of America, are the
words “Freedom” and “Liberty.”
Day after day Americans
are inundated with media stories that proclaim the virtues of democracy
being spread throughout the world. We are told that dictators are being
cast down and democracy is being put in place. This is reported as if it
is great progress. America is characterized as a benevolent champion of
human rights and personal freedom. We are told that oppressed people
are being liberated. In Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, and nation after
nation, we see national leaders being swept aside and democratic
governments set in place. (More will be shared on the falseness of what
is reported later.)
Where did this notion arise that
nations ruled by a strong central ruler are evil, and democratic
government “of the people, by the people, for the people” are righteous
and honorable? As one reads the Bible they will find that there were no
democratic nations. Israel was a theocracy until the people demanded a
king. For many centuries following it was a Monarchy. There were both
good kings, and evil kings, but Yahweh never suggested that the Monarchy
itself was evil, and the people would be better served with a
democratic form of government.
I Peter 2:17
Honor all people, love the brotherhood, fear God, honor the king.
Americans, we have been indoctrinated from our youth on up to believe
there is some intrinsic virtue to a democratic republic where the people
choose their leaders, and form their own laws. Stop for just a moment
and consider how antithetical such a concept is to the Kingdom of God.
How does this natural realm of government correlate to the spiritual
The Bible describes the domain of Yahweh’s rule
as a Kingdom. Christ came preaching that the KINGDOM of God was at hand.
We understand that in the Kingdom of God there is a central figure who
is ruler over all things. This is Yahweh, the Creator, and the sustainer
of all life. Would any Christian dare think that it is an evil thing
for Yahweh to rule over His creation? Would any be justified to suggest
that mankind would be better off to choose its own spiritual Head and
Sovereign, or to form her own laws? Does any saint dare infer that the
world would be better off with men being the source of governmental
authority in the Kingdom of God, in place of Yahweh?
is one being, however, who has in his pride and conceit rebelled
against the King of heaven and sought to establish his own rule. This
one is Satan. What form of government do you suppose Satan would set
forth as superior to subjecting oneself to the rule of the King of
Heaven? It is self-rule! The motto of Satan’s kingdom is the same as we
previously found to be adopted by the Hellfire Club. It is “Do as thou
Do What Thou Wilt
is a rebel. He was not content to do the will of Yahweh, choosing
rather to do his own will. The self-willed nature of Satan is revealed
in the famous passage from Isaiah that recounts the fall of this
How you have
fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have
been cut down to the earth, you who have weakened the nations! But you
said in your heart,
‘I will ascend to heaven;
I will raise my throne above the stars of God, and
I will sit on the mount of assembly in the recesses of the north.
I will ascend above the heights of the clouds;
I will make myself like the Most High.’
was given a very high and glorious position as the Covering Cherub who
stood in the presence of Yahweh. Nevertheless, he came to view his role
as detestable. He wanted to ascend higher. Pride and conceit corrupted
his wisdom and led to his rebellion. The apostle Paul recognized the
source of Satan’s fall as he was giving counsel to Timothy regarding the
appointment of church elders.
I Timothy 3:6
And not a new convert, so that he will not become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil.
The prophet Ezekiel describes the fall of Satan in greater detail.
had the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You
were in Eden, the garden of God; Every precious stone was your covering:
The ruby, the topaz and the diamond; The beryl, the onyx and the
jasper; The lapis lazuli, the turquoise and the emerald; And the gold,
the workmanship of your settings and sockets, was in you. On the day
that you were created they were prepared. You were the anointed cherub
who covers, and I placed you there. You were on the holy mountain of
God; You walked in the midst of the stones of fire. You were blameless
in your ways from the day you were created until unrighteousness was
found in you. By the abundance of your trade you were internally filled
with violence, and you sinned; Therefore I have cast you as profane from
the mountain of God. And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub, from
the midst of the stones of fire. Your heart was lifted up because of
your beauty; You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor.”
the high and glorious position assigned to him by Yahweh, Satan desired
more. He wanted to ascend. He wanted to be equal to God. He wanted to
do his own will rather than serve the will of Another. Consider the
great contrast between the attitude manifested by Satan, and that
revealed in the life of the Son of God. The apostle Paul tells us:
this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Yahshua, who,
although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God
a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a
bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. Being found in
appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the
point of death, even death on a cross.
in the form of God. We are told that Yahshua is the firstborn of all
creation. He was the first exhalation of the Father. He was the word of
Yahweh given form. He fully expressed the image and likeness of His
Father. Yet, Christ did not demand to be equal in authority, to choose
His own way, nor to do His own will. He freely SUBMITTED to Yahweh, and
was willing even to take upon a form that was humble and lowly. He
stooped to serve, willingly laying aside the glory He had with the
Father to walk about in the form of fallen mankind.
II Corinthians 8:9
you know the grace of our Lord Yahshua Christ, that though He was rich,
yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might
But we do see Him who was made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Yahshua...
The glorious Son of God, took upon a form that was lower than the angels, though all the angels were created by Him.
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For
by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth,
visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or
authorities -- all things have been created through Him and for Him.
only did the Son of God willingly humble Himself at the Father’s
direction, but He became more lowly still. He was despised and rejected
by men. He did not demand to be worshiped. He became a servant to
others. He even girded Himself about with a towel and bent down to wash
the feet of His disciples when none of them would do so.
His entire earthly career, the Son of God never once did anything of
His own initiative. He only did that which the Father commanded Him to
Yahshua said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and have come from God, for I have not even come on My own initiative, but He sent Me.”
“I can do nothing on My own initiative. As I hear, I judge; and My judgment is just, because I do not seek My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.”
Observe the stark contrast in the attitude of Christ and that of Satan. Satan said five times, “I WILL!” The Son of God said, “I do not seek My own will,
but the will of Him who sent Me.” Even at the end of His earthly
course, as the Father made known to the Son that He must be rejected by
the Jews, beaten, spat upon, scourged, and nailed to a cross, Yahshua
did not shrink back from doing the Father’s will. Though His own soul
recoiled greatly at the cup of suffering presented to Him, His
commitment to do ONLY the will of the Father remained unshaken.
"Father, if You are willing, remove this cup from Me; yet not My will, but Yours be done."
of God, this is the great distinction between the pride and rebellion
of Satan and the humility and submission of Yahshua. I ask you, which of
these two heavenly beings attitude was exemplified by the founding
father’s of America? This is a question that seems to be completely
avoided by men and women who describe the United States as a Christian
nation. What plan did Satan inspire Freemasons to embrace as they met in
the Green Dragon Tavern? Was it not a mirror of his own rebellion? Did
not these men determine that they would not be ruled over by another,
but would cast off the authority of a king and establish their own
government? Let us judge with righteous judgment. It was not the Spirit
of Christ that inspired men to rebel against the king. It was the proud
spirit of Lucifer. Under the banner of their spiritual leader these men
Satan’s motto is “Do what thou wilt.”
This expression which is embraced by Satanists, witches, and other
occultists today, which was the motto of the Hellfire Club of which
Benjamin Franklin was a member, has found expression in the seminal
documents of America. Over and over it has been declared that America is
a righteous nation, even a Christian nation. Her form of government is
deemed to be divinely blessed.
In the previous chapter titled As Above, So Below,
the mirroring of things in the heavens upon the earth was in view. The
Bible reveals that Satan is a rebel. He revolted against the rule of
Yahweh has King of all creation. He has sought to induce men to follow
his example as they engage in revolts and usurpations.
Satan five times stated “I will,” he was declaring his independence
from the rule of Yahweh. He sought to set his own throne beside the
throne of the Almighty. He did not want to be ruled, but to be his own
ruler. Thomas Jefferson wrote The Declaration of Independence,
echoing Satan’s own revolt against the King of heaven. Jefferson
described the King of England as a tyrant, and Satan also seeks to
disparage Yahweh in order to justify his rebellion.
is no correspondence between America’s form of government and the
government of God. Yahweh’s dominion is a kingdom. The form of
government adopted by America’s founding father’s is that of Lucifer. He
has enticed men with the promise of ruling themselves, creating their
own government, writing their own laws, and appointing and removing
their rulers at will. Even as the Liberty bell sounded a discordant note
when struck, so too does America’s form of government find great
harmonic dissonance with the Kingdom of God.
sought to disguise the rebellious nature of this form of government. He
uses words like “Freedom” and “Liberty” to put a positive spin on
things. Recently the XXX Olympiad was held in London, the Satanic city
that is dominated by images of dragons. The opening and closing
ceremonies were showpieces of occult and Satanic rule. During the
closing ceremony the word “FREEDOM” was displayed in large letters.
ask you, “What does Satan have to do with freedom?” It was his own
personal freedom and liberty that he sought when he rebelled against
Yahweh. When Satan says “Freedom” he means “Rebellion.” When he says
“Liberty” he means “Self-rule.” He has persuaded mankind that it is
their right to do as they please, unfettered by any moral restraint from
God or man. We are seeing the diabolical fruit of his campaign in the
mature fruit of America as a nation. We can observe where unfettered
liberty and freedom have led.
America is a nation that
has slaughtered more than 50 million unborn children in a hedonistic
pursuit of sexual liberation, and unbridled lust. It has “pleased”
millions of men and women to fornicate, and to commit adultery, without
the consequence of child rearing. America is a nation that champions
homosexuality in the name of personal freedom. She exports pornography,
violence, rebellion, the drug culture, profane and obscene music,
movies, and television programs throughout the world. America has truly
lived by the motto “Do as thou wilt” and she is morally, spiritually,
and financially bankrupt.
People of God, understand
that there have been no more dangerous words sold to mankind as their
inalienable rights that “Freedom” and “Liberty.” Christ said:
“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.”
is the pattern for those who would be His disciples. Why then has the
church embraced the government and behavior of Satan as their pattern?
Are they not deceived?
Christ is set forth as the
pattern for righteousness. He did not live to please self. He had no
overriding principle of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. On
the contrary, Yahshua laid down His life. He surrendered His liberty as
was proven at the cross when He said “Not My will, but Thy will be
done.” He did not live for the pursuit of His own happiness. The apostle
For even Christ did not please Himself...
of God, if you have the discernment of heaven, when you hear the words
“Freedom” and “Liberty” being championed in this hour, they should
strike your ears with a discordant sound. You too should recognize that
Satan is using such words to lead mankind down that broad path that
leads to destruction.
When Satan says “Let freedom
ring,” he means you should cast off all restraint, including that of
heaven. Live for self. Pursue your own happiness. This is his message of
light, but it is truly darkness.
who loves his life loses it, and he who hates his life in this world
will keep it to life eternal. If anyone serves Me, he must follow Me...”
is a cross for every son of God. There is a path of self-denial to be
walked. We too must say, “Not my will, but Thy will be done.”
This is NOT the path the founding fathers of America chose, and the end will surely show it.
Heart4God Website: http://www.heart4god.ws
Parables Blog: www.parablesblog.blogspot.com
P.O. Box 804
Montezuma, GA 31063