tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6945380218619316662.post101716688149252946..comments2024-03-24T18:02:00.476-04:00Comments on parablesblog: Vanishing EvidenceJoseph Herrinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14729899526301330525noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6945380218619316662.post-63005842885269382372017-02-08T07:43:09.728-05:002017-02-08T07:43:09.728-05:00Dear John,
I have actually reported on the origin...Dear John,<br /><br />I have actually reported on the original footage of the Apollo moon shot. If you are interested in reading up on it perhaps you will read the rest of the book.<br /><br />Joseph HerrinJoseph Herrinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14729899526301330525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6945380218619316662.post-81373402444290486892017-02-08T05:50:12.856-05:002017-02-08T05:50:12.856-05:00There is no original video footage of the 1969 moo...There is no original video footage of the 1969 moon landing. Specifically, the footage of Neil Armstrong's first steps on the moon's surface is actually video of a video. This existing footage is the recording of the screen at Mission Control in Houston when the moon landing was taking place. The raw footage was accidentally taped over, but the mishap was not realized until the late '90s or early '00s. Officials at NASA discovered where the tapes ended up, but they were unfortunately part of a batch of 200,000 tapes that were magnetically and re-used in an effort to save money. NASA claims that new, restored copies of the original broadcast look even better.<br /><br />Nothing fishy going on here folks!!! Just go on back to sleep......Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17657577667436052575noreply@blogger.com